Find Laptop

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, 23 October 2012

Cyclingpharmacology

Posted on 06:46 by Unknown


I love watching the Tour de France (that’s cycling for the ones who have no idea what I’m talking about). The home country’s public television always live broadcasts all the entire stages of the Tour, so for me the ultimate feeling of being too bored during the summer holiday is to watch an entire stage of the Tour de France. And the Tour de France helped me survive the week between BlueEyes’ due date and his actual birthday, when my belly was too big and it was too hot outside to do anything else than bounce on a yoga ball and watch entire days of Tour de France. So why write about the Tour de France in October? Because the UCI just decided to take away all of Lance Armstrong’s seven Tour titlesafter the US anti-doping agency released a huge amount of evidence against him. This enormous amount of doping use suggests that Lance Armstrong was not the only one, but that some/most/all (?) of the professional cyclists in the Tour used some form of doping. This has caused some of the big sponsors, like Rabobank,to quit sponsoring cycling teams. But it also means that somewhere in the world there are teams of doctors that are able to mix drugs, vitamins and blood transfusions in such a way that a man who was once a cancer patient, can a few years later make it seem like he is the only one cycling while all of the others are standing still (like in the prologue in 2005 when Lance Armstrong flew by Jan Ullrich). Any other medical success of that size would for sure be discussed on TV, but these people have to stay anonymous because what they do is not legal.

So does knowing that some, most or all of the cyclists use doping make it less fun to watch? To me it doesn’t. It’s not like with doping it’s easy to cycle 3500 kilometers in a couple weeks. It’s not like any person could do it with the right amount of doping and it’s not like the athletes are not sacrificing their life in order to train enough to be able to cycle in the Tour de France. 

So why not make it legal to use doping? Then the sport would be kind of like Formula 1 or Nascar racing, where teams of people try to make the best and fastest car. In this case teams of doctors and scientist would build the best body to cycle with. We could study how that works, and test all sorts of things, like viral vector mediated expression of genes to enhance muscle fiber and oxygen transport. And the people behind this don’t have to hide anymore but can share their knowledge with the world. I even thought of a name for this discipline: cyclingpharmacology. Has a nice ring to it right?
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in doping, pharmacology, pregnancy, sports, tour de france | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • About academic culture and reward/bullshit ratio
    Dr. Isis’ blog was the first science blog I read when I was in grad school. I was always impressed by her upbeat way of writing about combi...
  • Is it okay to watch Netflix in the lab?
    Because of the success of my last question; Is it okay to cry in the lab? , here’s another one: Before I moved to the US I thought that most...
  • 2012: the year I started to blog
    This year, I decided to start blogging for a number of reasons. First, I felt that I needed some more practice writing. English is not my f...
  • Musings on pseudonymity
    Today I got an email asking if I wanted to write for the Guest Blogge at Scientopia , and I was really excited about that. I haven’t been b...
  • Things I did while pregnant: grow a baby
    I think by now we all now that Marissa Mayer, CEO of Yahoo is pregnant . On twitter, this started the #ThingsIdidWhilePg hashtag, in which ...
  • Is it okay to have a baby before tenure?
    Last Friday, there was an interesting discussion over at DrugMonkey  where people were rehearsed the same discussion about whether postdocs ...
  • Kissing and hugging etiquette
    Back in the home country, it is normal to kiss each other on the cheek three times (left, right and left again). You kiss when you see peop...
  • When talking to students and post-docs
    Dear senior investigators, When you are invited to give a talk somewhere, and are thus scheduled to have lunch with students and post-docs...
  • Guest Post: The Pregnant Post-Doc Search
    Today, my fellow blogger and electrophysiologist (and soon-to-be mom!!) The Cellular Scale and I are swapping blog posts. I am over at her...
  • On delusional academics
    The other day, I was talking to transitioning out of academia with a couple people in my lab. One of the grad students had just...

Categories

  • absurd
  • academia
  • addiction
  • advice
  • attachment parenting
  • authorship
  • baby
  • babywearing
  • birth
  • blog carnival
  • blogging
  • books
  • breastfeeding
  • bureaucracy
  • clumsy
  • co-sleeping
  • collaboration
  • cultural differences
  • cycling
  • daycare
  • decisions
  • disgruntled postdoc
  • doping
  • doula
  • drinking
  • eating
  • efficiency
  • electrophysiology
  • ethics
  • experiments
  • feminism
  • finding a job
  • food
  • funding
  • giving a talk
  • graduate student
  • grant writing
  • guest post
  • guilt
  • homeopathy
  • ideas
  • imposter syndrome
  • in the news
  • introduction
  • IWD
  • K99
  • lazy
  • leaving academia
  • life in the lab
  • managing people
  • marriage
  • maternity leave
  • meeting
  • mentoring
  • migraine
  • money
  • negotiating
  • networking
  • neuroscience
  • NIH
  • observations
  • outfit
  • parenting
  • pharmacology
  • photograph
  • playground
  • postdoc
  • poster
  • pregnancy
  • pride
  • procrastination
  • Pub-Style Science
  • publishing papers
  • pumping milk
  • recommendation letters
  • relevance
  • review
  • role models
  • safety
  • science
  • Scientopia
  • sequestration
  • SfN
  • sleep
  • smartphone
  • society
  • sports
  • summer
  • Sunday morning musings
  • talking
  • television
  • tenure track
  • thesis
  • toddler
  • tour de france
  • toys
  • travel
  • twitter
  • update
  • vacation
  • women in science
  • word
  • work
  • work-life balance
  • working mom
  • worrying
  • writing

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (65)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (8)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (8)
  • ▼  2012 (92)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ▼  October (11)
      • Staring at other people’s grants
      • An animal model for psychiatric disease
      • Cyclingpharmacology
      • Introduce people to each other!
      • How to dress as a woman.
      • Slutty secretaries
      • To a conference in baby-detach mode
      • 'Nighttime parenting' by Sears
      • What about the data you never see?
      • On high risk experiments and knowing when to stop
      • If David Lynch made kids' TV...
    • ►  September (12)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (10)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile