Find Laptop

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, 5 June 2012

Americanisms

Posted on 10:46 by Unknown

Moving to another country often means speaking a different language. And even though English is obviously not my first language, I generally do okay speaking English, which is mostly because back home a lot of the television we watch are American shows that are subtitled (instead of dubbed like in France and Germany). But speaking a different language also means learning a whole set of different rules about how to say things in a polite way.

Because back home, my people are not just known for their liberal policy on weed, prostitution and euthanasia, but also for their directness. Let me give you a couple of examples of Americanisms as we like to call them:

Example 1. You want to ask a technician to run a PCR for you.
In American:
You: Hi, how are you?
Technician: I’m good, how are you?
You: I’m good, thanks. Did you have a good weekend?
Technician: I did, thanks, how about yourself?
You: It was fine thanks! How’s your dog doing?
Technician: Oh thanks for asking, he’s much better now that he has the new eye drops.
You: Oh good, I’m glad to hear that. Also, would you be willing to do this PCR for me please?
Technician: Sure, no problem.

In Dutch:
You: Good morning, can you do this PCR for me please?
Technician: Okay.
(and then later we’ll talk about the weekend and the dog)

Example 2. You’re in a labmeeting and someone shows data that don’t make sense because there is no proper control group. You think they should include that control group to even make the slightest chance to submit it somewhere
In American:
You: Thank you for that wonderful talk. Those are all very intriguing data. I was wondering one thing though, which is: what would you hypothesize would happen in the untreated group?

In Dutch:
You: Don’t you have a control group? It makes no sense to do these experiments and not have a proper control group. You can forget about sending this to any decent journal.

Example 3. You’re talking to your advisor about data. Your advisor tells you:
In American: Those are very interesting data.
In Dutch: Those are very nice and interesting data.

In American: Those are interesting data. Perhaps we should follow this up.
In Dutch: Those are crappy data. You have to do that experiment again.

In American: Those are interesting data (looking at a Western blot). What do you think that big black band is?
In Dutch: That is a horrible Western blot. There is only background staining and no real bands.

I have to say that I sometimes miss this directness because it makes it so much easier to understand what people are actually saying. I can imagine that for Americans that move to my home country, it has to be hard to get used to all this impoliteness and directness of saying things. I still sometimes make the ‘mistake’ of saying something in a way too direct tone in a labmeeting, but am definitely trying to work on my Americanisms. Example 3 by the way is (almost) an actual conversation between Dr. BrownEyes and his advisor. We have spent several evenings trying to figure out what his advisor’s Americanisms actually mean.



Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in cultural differences, life in the lab | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • About academic culture and reward/bullshit ratio
    Dr. Isis’ blog was the first science blog I read when I was in grad school. I was always impressed by her upbeat way of writing about combi...
  • 2012: the year I started to blog
    This year, I decided to start blogging for a number of reasons. First, I felt that I needed some more practice writing. English is not my f...
  • On parent-friendly science
    So a lot of people, for example Erin McKiernan and TSZuska share my opinion that the recent piece in Nature kind of misses the point in t...
  • When talking to students and post-docs
    Dear senior investigators, When you are invited to give a talk somewhere, and are thus scheduled to have lunch with students and post-docs...
  • When role models are super models
    This week, Nature has a special section about women in science . Wait, aren’t we all just scientists? And is Nature going to have a special...
  • Things that make me sad and angry
    In my homecountry, the country that was the first to allow same-sex marriage , obviously same-sex parents also care for foster children. The...
  • Guest Post: The Pregnant Post-Doc Search
    Today, my fellow blogger and electrophysiologist (and soon-to-be mom!!) The Cellular Scale and I are swapping blog posts. I am over at her...
  • On motivation in the lab
    Without going into too much detail about the state that our lab is in due to the economy and sequestration , there is a great lack in motiv...
  • 'Nighttime parenting' by Sears
    I already admitted recently that we bought our first baby sleep book. After a year of not sleeping much longer than 3-4 hours (or less) at...
  • Musings on pseudonymity
    Today I got an email asking if I wanted to write for the Guest Blogge at Scientopia , and I was really excited about that. I haven’t been b...

Categories

  • absurd
  • academia
  • addiction
  • advice
  • attachment parenting
  • authorship
  • baby
  • babywearing
  • birth
  • blog carnival
  • blogging
  • books
  • breastfeeding
  • bureaucracy
  • clumsy
  • co-sleeping
  • collaboration
  • cultural differences
  • cycling
  • daycare
  • decisions
  • disgruntled postdoc
  • doping
  • doula
  • drinking
  • eating
  • efficiency
  • electrophysiology
  • ethics
  • experiments
  • feminism
  • finding a job
  • food
  • funding
  • giving a talk
  • graduate student
  • grant writing
  • guest post
  • guilt
  • homeopathy
  • ideas
  • imposter syndrome
  • in the news
  • introduction
  • IWD
  • K99
  • lazy
  • leaving academia
  • life in the lab
  • managing people
  • marriage
  • maternity leave
  • meeting
  • mentoring
  • migraine
  • money
  • negotiating
  • networking
  • neuroscience
  • NIH
  • observations
  • outfit
  • parenting
  • pharmacology
  • photograph
  • playground
  • postdoc
  • poster
  • pregnancy
  • pride
  • procrastination
  • Pub-Style Science
  • publishing papers
  • pumping milk
  • recommendation letters
  • relevance
  • review
  • role models
  • safety
  • science
  • Scientopia
  • sequestration
  • SfN
  • sleep
  • smartphone
  • society
  • sports
  • summer
  • Sunday morning musings
  • talking
  • television
  • tenure track
  • thesis
  • toddler
  • tour de france
  • toys
  • travel
  • twitter
  • update
  • vacation
  • women in science
  • word
  • work
  • work-life balance
  • working mom
  • worrying
  • writing

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (65)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (8)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (8)
  • ▼  2012 (92)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (11)
    • ►  September (12)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ▼  June (8)
      • On babywearing
      • You could have given me that money for real scienc...
      • No regrets?
      • On marriage and all other forms of commitment
      • Idea-generation anxiety
      • When is it enough?
      • Americanisms
      • Memoirs of an Addicted Brain – a review
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (10)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile